Last week we posted a poll about the use of artemisinin tea as a prophylactic against malaria. As of today, 11 of the 7700+ subscribers have voted - all against by the way. Once again we ask you to voice your opinion. After all, there are many that argue in favour of using artemisinin tea as a prophylactic. For years it has been argued that tea is even a much better option than ACTs. So what do you think? Good or bad idea?
Kenya is hot these days, in terms of scientific developments. The reporting of a 'new' mosquito species by Dr. Jenny Stevenson and colleagues has been reported around the world. Yet, it is not clear whether indeed this is a new species or not. Refuted by Dr. Charles Mbogo, president of the Pan African Mosquito Control Association (PAMCA) in a recent press communication, but nevertheless intriguing. Is this a strain that has adapted towards outdoor and crepuscular feeding because of intense indoor-based control methods (IRS and bednets)?
Interestingly, Dr. Mbogo also makes a strong case for focusing on larval control as an add-on or alternative to indoor residual spraying and bednets. Thereby going against the WHO's position statement on larval control. What do you think? We welcome your thoughts.
Enjoy this week's MalariaWorld - the MW team.

Comments
In their paper entitled
artemisia annua tea
Torunn Stangeland
Please vote...
Artemisia annua tea
favour of using the tea
Yes, use of natural herbal
Use of artemisia tea for malaria
Chhaya Godse